Grains VS. The Book of Mormon

Do the descriptions of certain types of grain disprove the Book of Mormon. … Book of Mormon cult missionaries mormon temples

Posted by Mormon Lifestyle Admin on and filed under History/Temple Videos. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response by filling following comment form or trackback to this entry from your site

13 Responses for “Grains VS. The Book of Mormon”

  1. digestezine says:

    a 1983 Science magazine article describing barley found in a pre-Columbian setting is wrongly claimed as support for the Book of Mormon because the grain described was not a domesticated old world barley

  2. digestezine says:

    please note the first guy says at 21 seconds domesticated barley, either he made a slip of the tongue or he is not telling the truth

  3. digestezine says:

    The Book of Mormon indicates that the Nephites produced various crops including barley (Mosiah 7:22, 9:9; Alma 11:7, 15), figs (3 Nephi 14:16), grapes (2 Nephi 15:2, 4; 3 Nephi 14:16), and wheat (Mosiah 9:9, 3 Nephi 18:18). However, there has been no archeological evidence for any of these crops. Archeology does indicate the peoples of the region ate maize (corn), lima beans, tomatoes, squash, and amaranth, but none of these crops are mentioned in the Book of Mormon

  4. MormonDefenders says:

    What’s your source?

  5. digestezine says:

    the 1983 science magazine

  6. MormonDefenders says:

    One year later, As this last statement was being written, archaeologists discovered several specimens of pre-Columbian domesticated barley while excavating a Hohokam Indian site near Phoenix, Arizona.

  7. MormonDefenders says:

    This startling discovery was later confirmed by additional discoveries in both Oklahoma and Illinois. “It is reasonable to conclude that we are looking at a North American domesticated grain crop whose existence has not been suspected.”46

  8. MormonDefenders says:

    47 Nancy and David Asch, “Archaeobotany,” Deer Track: A Late Woodland Village in the Mississippi Valley, edited by Charles R. McGimsey and Michael D. Conner (Kampsville, Illinois: Center for American Archaeology, 1985)

  9. MormonDefenders says:

    Read the comments above.

  10. URALLKUNTS says:

    well its 2008 now and im sure theres been alot of new findings since then. the bom mentioned elephants and critics said there werent any back then or now. and yet years later they find carvings in ancient american times with elephant carvins in them. just because a magazine said it back then doesnt make it absolute truth now. scientists and people believed the earth was flat and now look at what we beleive now.

  11. MormonDefenders says:

    Good Point!

  12. mitsupitsu44 says:

    I know that the book of mormon is true,and that it really is a second witness of Jesus Christ,and i invite nonbeleivers to read it(especially moroni 10:3-5)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  13. 1MoNoMo says:

    LDS rhetoric is SO, SO predictable,

You must be logged in to post a comment Login